PanludiaEVALUATION POLICY
Four perspectives.
Evidence first.
Four independent badges help you read an integration’s strengths and limitations. The same criteria apply to Panludia and community integrations.
A badge, at a glance
One level per axis. No overall rating.
Not assessedNot enough assessed evidence to assign a level.
Limited supportThe assessment identifies substantial gaps or limitations.
Partial supportThe assessment identifies important limitations.
Substantial supportThe assessment supports this level with bounded caveats.
Strong supportThe assessment strongly supports this level within the reviewed scope.
What we look at
Each axis answers a different question.
Security & compliance
How the implementation approaches security and compliance within the reviewed scope.
Gameplay
How the integration supports its intended player experience.
Technical quality
The technical quality and maintainability of the implementation.
Stability
The reliability of the integration within the reviewed scope.
FROM EVIDENCE TO BADGE
How we evaluate
We assess each integration internally using the same framework for Panludia and community projects. Detailed indicators, scoring rules and weights are not public, to prevent targeted optimization against specific checks. We publish the resulting badges, reviewed versions, dates and rating history. Each assessment reflects the information available at that time.
Help refine a review
Check the reviewed version, date and rating history on the integration’s Evaluation tab. Use the linked project and maintainer channels to report a reproducible issue or relevant changes; new information can change a badge.